However, compared to Wireshark’s geeky style UI, the office style UI of Capsa has better user experience and is easier to use.Ĭapsa can be scheduled to run capture periodically. Unlike Wireshark, Capsa is limited to windows environments. Wireshark is cross-platform, using the GTK+ widget toolkit to implement its user interface, and using pcap to capture packets it runs on various Unix-like operating systems including Linux, Mac OS X, BSD, and Solaris, and on Microsoft Windows. Here I want to talk about the differences between Capsa Enterprise (Hereinafter referred to as Capsa) and Wireshark. The Enterprise edition of Capsa has many of the same abilities as Wireshark. As we all know, Capsa has 3 editions, which are Capsa Free, Capsa Professional and Capsa Enterprise. The person answering this question has covered a lot of ground in this answer. Capsa Enterprise is more on par with Wireshark, capturing packets for both Ethernet and wireless traffic.”
For free, Capsa provides light network analysis and monitoring of Ethernet networks only. However, it's more user-friendly than Wireshark and has a UI that is familiar enough for anyone who administers Windows servers to get up to speed fairly quickly.Ĭapsa is offered in a free edition, although you get a lot less functionality with the free version than you do with Wireshark. Nor does Capsa work cross-platform As you said, it's limited to Windows environments, unlike Wireshark. The Enterprise edition of Capsa has many of the same abilities as Wireshark, except Capsa is not free. It's a network analyzer and packet sniffer that provides excellent visualization of network traffic. This question has got the best answer chosen by the asker. I know Capsa has 2 other editions which are not free, and it's for windows. “Who knows the difference between Wireshark and Capsa? Not too long ago, I saw a question, “ What's the difference? Wireshark, Colasoft Capsa?” which was asked in Yahoo answer.
0 kommentar(er)
